Commentaries

Bridging the Week by Gary DeWaal: May 2 – 6 and 9, 2016 (AML CIP; Ether; LOPR; Variable Annuities)

Jump to: AML and Bribery    Bitcoin Ecosystem    Bridging the Week    Position and Trade Reporting    Position Limits    Uncleared Swaps   
Email Print
Published Date: May 08, 2016

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network finalized rules that will impose new due diligence requirements on banks, broker-dealers, futures commission merchants, mutual funds and introducing brokers when opening new accounts for legal entity customers (e.g., corporations). In addition, the New York State Department of Financial Services approved the trading of a new digital currency, Ether, on a previously approved cryptocurrency exchange. As a result, the following matters are covered in this week’s edition of Bridging the Week:

Video Version:

Article Version:

FinCEN Finalizes Rules Requiring Banks, Broker-Dealers, FCMs, Mutual Funds and IBs to Help Verify Beneficial Owners of Certain Accounts:

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network finalized rules requiring banks, broker-dealers, future commission merchants, introducing brokers and mutual funds (collectively, “covered firms”) to identify the beneficial owners of their legal entity customers. Currently such entities are mandatorily required to know the identity of each of their legal entity customers, but not necessarily their beneficial owners.

FinCEN also adopted rules making explicit the obligation of covered firms to understand the nature and purpose of their customer relationships in order to develop customer risk profiles, as well as to conduct ongoing monitoring for reporting suspicious transactions and, on a risk-basis, maintaining and updating customer information.

Under FinCEN’s new rules, covered firms must establish and maintain written procedures reasonably designed to identify and verify the identities of beneficial owners of legal entity customers unless such customers are expressly excluded (e.g., certain US or non-US regulated financial entities).

Beneficial owners include each real person who directly or indirectly has a 25 percent or more equity ownership interest in the legal entity customer, and a single individual with “significant responsibility to control, manage, or direct a legal entity customer, including an executive officer or senior manager or any other individual who regularly performs similar functions.” Legal entity customers include corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships and other similar business entities.

A covered firm must evidence its compliance with FinCEN’s new requirements by obtaining a mandatory certification form from a legal entity customer that identifies its beneficial owners or by receiving the information required by the form (i.e., for each beneficial owner, name, date of birth, address, and social security number, or for non-US persons, passport number) by another means with an appropriate certification. A covered firm must also verify the identity of each enumerated beneficial owners according to risk-based procedures that contain the elements required for verifying the identity of individuals under FinCEN’s existing relevant rules through documents or non-documentary methods (i.e., Customer Identification Program requirements (click here for a background on these requirements)). However, a covered firm may use photocopies or reproductions of original documents in connection with such verification.

FinCEN’s new requirements only apply in connection with the establishment of new accounts and will not ordinarily apply retroactively. However, a covered firm may have an obligation to obtain beneficial ownership information for an older account, if concerns about the account arise during ongoing monitoring.

If an intermediary is a covered firm’s customer and the covered firm currently has no FinCEN obligation today with respect to the underlying clients of the intermediary under CIP, the firm should treat the intermediary (not the intermediary’s underlying clients) as its legal entity customer.

Under FinCEN’s new rules, one covered firm may delegate its responsibilities to another covered firm, but only pursuant to a written contract that includes certain enumerated obligations.

In adopting its new rules, FinCEN expressed its belief that the new formal obligation of covered firms to understand the nature and purpose of their customer relationships and to conduct ongoing monitoring for reporting suspicious transactions are already implicit obligations of covered firms in connection with their suspicious activity reporting requirements.

As part of its new rules, FinCEN formally stated each of the elements of an acceptable anti-money laundering program for covered firms. The provisions are generally the same for each type of covered firm and include the following elements:

All covered firms except mutual funds are also expressly required to conduct training of appropriate persons under the new rules.

Covered firms must comply with FinCEN’s new rules beginning May 11, 2018. FinCEN is part of the US Department of Treasury. FinCEN initially proposed adoption of the new rules in March 2012.

Simultaneously with issuance of FinCEN's new rules, the US Department of Treasury announced its proposal for a new federal law that would require companies to report to it information regarding their beneficial ownership at the time of their creation.

Compliance Weeds: As under FinCEN’s existing CIP rules, an account for a futures commission merchant under its new beneficial ownership rules appears to be a clearing account, not an execution account. There are no CIP obligations for execution accounts. For broker-dealers, an account appears to be both a clearing and an execution account, however. That being said, in its commentary in connection with adoption of the its final rule for FCMs, FinCEN noted that “all account relationships, and not only those which are ‘accounts’ within the CIP rule definitions …must be monitored in some form in order to comply with existing [suspicious activity reporting] requirements.”

Briefly:

And more briefly:

For more information, see:

Broker-Dealer Sanctioned US $25 Million by FINRA for Variable Annuity Sales Offenses:
http://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/MSI_AWC_050316.pdf

CFTC Issues Final Rules Regarding the Material Terms for Swap Portfolio Reconciliation:
http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/federalregister050216.pdf

CFPB Proposes to Prohibit Arbitration Clauses by Banks:
http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/CFPB_Arbitration_Agreements_Notice_of_Proposed_Rulemaking.pdf

ESMA Revises Standards on Commodity Derivatives and Other Non-Equity Position Limits:
https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-amends-mifid-ii-standards-non-equity-transparency-and-position-limits

Fed Proposes Restrictions on Counterparties to Biggest Banks From Cancelling Certain Non-Cleared Financial Contracts After a Bank Enters Bankruptcy:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20160503b1.pdf

FinCEN Finalizes Rules Requiring Banks, Broker-Dealers, FCMs, Mutual Funds and IBs to Help Verify Beneficial Owners of Certain Accounts:
Anticipated final adopting release and rule:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2016-10567.pdf

NFA Begins Accepting Margin Models for Uncleared Swaps for Review:
https://www.nfa.futures.org/news/newsNotice.asp?ArticleID=4719

The information in this article is for informational purposes only and is derived from sources believed to be reliable as of May 7, 2016. No representation or warranty is made regarding the accuracy of any statement or information in this article. Also, the information in this article is not intended as a substitute for legal counsel, and is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. The impact of the law for any particular situation depends on a variety of factors; therefore, readers of this article should not act upon any information in the article without seeking professional legal counsel. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP may represent one or more entities mentioned in this article. Quotations attributable to speeches are from published remarks and may not reflect statements actually made.

Recent Commentaries

Categories

Archives



ABOUT GARY DEWAAL

Gary DeWaal

Gary DeWaal is currently Special Counsel with Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP in its New York office focusing on financial services regulatory matters. He provides advisory services and assists with investigations and litigation.


Social Media:

ABOUT KATTEN

Katten is a firm of first choice for clients seeking sophisticated, high-value legal services in the United States and abroad.

Our nationally recognized practices include corporate, financial services, litigation, real estate, environmental, commercial finance, insolvency and restructuring, intellectual property, and trusts and estates.

Our approximately 650 attorneys serve public and private companies, including nearly half of the Fortune 100, as well as a number of government and nonprofit organizations and individuals.

We provide full-service legal advice from locations across the United States and in London and Shanghai.

CONTACT US

Gary DeWaal
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
575 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022-2585

+1.212.940.6558




Request Information »

Join Mailing List »